if Being = Nature and Language = 01010101 is the Nature of .com therefore Communication ?

How to record Butterflies, CPR Phones & Ravens on the Line ?
Nõ Book Unpublished by See Through House

Is the Nature of Language the Language of Nature where Nature/Being is speaking through us?
Is Nature's transcendent beauty and earthly pain personified by Rose petals and thorns?
Is Human Nature's being in the world personified by bicycle pedals and wheels that go round?
If we have Nõ inspiration we have Nõ love for the Rose.
If we have inspiration we have love for the Rose.

"I: The passing of the past is something else than what has been.
J: How are we to think that?
I: As the gathering of what endures ...
J: ...which as you said recently, endures as what grants endurence ...
I: ....and stays the Same as the message...
J: ... which needs us as messengers." (Heidegger in OWL p54)

The Nature of language? The Language of Nature? We undergo ... endure it, suffer it, recieve it as it strikes us and submit to it ... touching the innermost nexus of our existence (Stothers). Language is the Nature of Being (Human). We are Beings of Language. Language is the Nature of our Being. Humans wear the masks of Language, revealing "the innermost nexus of our existence", touching the root and core of the Flower while the Flowers centre touches our innermost core. Nature / Being Language is writing us with questions of

Roses

... with questions of the Nature of Being.

In Samuel Beckett's All that Fall, the orphan is thrown upon the Railway Lines.
In Samuel Beckett's All that Fall, the orphan is thrown upon the lines of audio tracks.
Thrown like a butterfly upon the wheel of field recording it was always and only love

The "essential being of language is towards truth" (Versenyi) like a focus on labours of love.
If Truth is unspoken it still resides, endures, echoes, like the Om, unlike the Ohm,
empowering lines through power lines where Soundscape like the art of Nature Writing is Cinema for the Ear.

"J: There is a Japanese word that says the essential being of language, rather than being of use as a name for speaking and for language. I: The matter itself requires that, because the essential being of language cannot be anything linguistic. The same holds true for the phrase "house of being". J: From a great distance I sense a kinship between our word that is now before my mind, and your phrase. I: The phrase gives a hint of the nature of language. Then that hint would be the word's basic characteristic.(OWL, 24)

J: ... language is in itself metaphysical. (OWL, 35)

PRESENT . . . A simple chime, that served to time The rhythm of our rowing -

FUTURE . . . (From Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There )